by Summary:
Overall from 2003 to 2016 about 2.4%. If the last two years (2016 being an estimate are not counted) it's 3.5%. The collapse does not explain the impeachment (on this more later). It's more the result of the Workers' Party administration already caving and accepting the austerity policies promoted by the opposition.
Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: Brazil, Impeachment
This could be interesting, too:
Overall from 2003 to 2016 about 2.4%. If the last two years (2016 being an estimate are not counted) it's 3.5%. The collapse does not explain the impeachment (on this more later). It's more the result of the Workers' Party administration already caving and accepting the austerity policies promoted by the opposition.
Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: Brazil, Impeachment
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Lulismo’s Past and Present
Matias Vernengo writes On central bank independence, and Brazilian monetary policy
Robert Waldmann writes What is happening in Brazil
Matias Vernengo writes Lula’s election and what lies ahead
Overall from 2003 to 2016 about 2.4%. If the last two years (2016 being an estimate are not counted) it's 3.5%.
The collapse does not explain the impeachment (on this more later). It's more the result of the Workers' Party administration already caving and accepting the austerity policies promoted by the opposition.
