Wednesday , May 8 2024
Home / Naked Keynesianism / Three Globalizations, Not Two: Rethinking the History and Economics of Trade and Globalization

Three Globalizations, Not Two: Rethinking the History and Economics of Trade and Globalization

Summary:
By Thomas Palley (Guest blogger)The conventional wisdom is there have been two globalizations in the modern era. The first began around 1870 and ended in 1914. The second began in 1945 and is still underway. This paper challenges that view and argues there have been three globalizations, not two. The first half of the paper provides empirical evidence for the three globalizations hypothesis. The second half discusses its analytical implications. The Victorian first globalization and Keynesian era second globalization were driven by gains from trade, and those gains increased industrialized country real wages. The neoliberal third globalization has been driven by industrial reorganization motivated by distributional conflict. Trade theory does not explain the third globalization;

Topics:
Matias Vernengo considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Nick Falvo writes Homelessness among racialized persons

tom writes The corruption of US foreign policy & weaponization of antisemitism

Merijn T. Knibbe writes Something about prices (IV). Gift exchange prices.

tom writes The menace of the myth of General Pinochet’s Chilean economic miracle

Three Globalizations, Not Two: Rethinking the History and Economics of Trade and Globalization
 By Thomas Palley (Guest blogger)

The conventional wisdom is there have been two globalizations in the modern era. The first began around 1870 and ended in 1914. The second began in 1945 and is still underway. This paper challenges that view and argues there have been three globalizations, not two. The first half of the paper provides empirical evidence for the three globalizations hypothesis. The second half discusses its analytical implications. The Victorian first globalization and Keynesian era second globalization were driven by gains from trade, and those gains increased industrialized country real wages. The neoliberal third globalization has been driven by industrial reorganization motivated by distributional conflict. Trade theory does not explain the third globalization; capital’s share has increased at the expense of labor’s; and there can be no presumption of mutually beneficial country gains from the third globalization.

Read rest here.

Matias Vernengo
Econ Prof at @BucknellU Co-editor of ROKE & Co-Editor in Chief of the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *