Tuesday , May 7 2024
Home / Real-World Economics Review / Mathematics is to science what a hammer is to a carpenter.

Mathematics is to science what a hammer is to a carpenter.

Summary:
From Rob Reno Mathematics is to science what a hammer is to a carpenter. It is a man-made tool (a language invented as needed) with an uncanny power to accurately measure physical reality. But it is not the only tool in a scientists toolbox, albeit an essential one and indispensable for creating an intersubjective verifiable intelligent discussion of the material aspects of the cosmos. But it is not necessarily a part of the higher realization of truth. The recognition of emergent phenomenon is not dependent upon mathematics. The observation that not only in the realms of life but even in the world of physical energy, the sum of two or more things is very often something more than, or something different from, the predictable additive consequences of such unions. The entire science of

Topics:
Editor considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Editor writes Water Flowing Upwards: Net financial flows from developing countries

John Quiggin writes Machines and tools

Eric Kramer writes An economic analysis of presidential immunity

Angry Bear writes Protesting Now and in the Sixties and Seventies

from Rob Reno

Mathematics is to science what a hammer is to a carpenter. It is a man-made tool (a language invented as needed) with an uncanny power to accurately measure physical reality. But it is not the only tool in a scientists toolbox, albeit an essential one and indispensable for creating an intersubjective verifiable intelligent discussion of the material aspects of the cosmos. But it is not necessarily a part of the higher realization of truth. The recognition of emergent phenomenon is not dependent upon mathematics. The observation that not only in the realms of life but even in the world of physical energy, the sum of two or more things is very often something more than, or something different from, the predictable additive consequences of such unions. The entire science of mathematics, the whole domain of philosophy, the highest physics or chemistry, could not predict or know that the union of two gaseous hydrogen atoms with one gaseous oxygen atom would result in a new and qualitatively superadditive substance—liquid water.
https://rwer.wordpress.com/2019/03/24/certain-decisions/#comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *