Monday , June 14 2021
Home / Real-World Economics Review / Keynes on microfoundations

Keynes on microfoundations

Summary:
From Lars Syll The atomic hypothesis which has worked so splendidly in Physics breaks down in Psychics. We are faced at every turn with the problems of Organic Unity, of Discreteness, of Discontinuity – the whole is not equal to the sum of the parts, comparisons of quantity fails us, small changes produce large effects, the assumptions of a uniform and homogeneous continuum are not satisfied. Thus the results of Mathematical Psychics turn out to be derivative, not fundamental, indexes, not measurements, first approximations at the best; and fallible indexes, dubious approximations at that, with much doubt added as to what, if anything, they are indexes or approximations of. Where ‘New Keynesian’ and New Classical economists think that they can rigorously deduce the aggregate effects of

Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Dan Crawford writes Weekly Indicators for June 7 – 11 at Seeking Alpha

Dean Baker writes How does bloated CEO pay maximize shareholder value? One of the great mysteries of the world

Editor writes If history follows the path Thomas Piketty noted, it will . . .

Lars Pålsson Syll writes On the limits of ‘mediation analysis’ and ‘statistical causality’

from Lars Syll

Keynes on microfoundationsThe atomic hypothesis which has worked so splendidly in Physics breaks down in Psychics. We are faced at every turn with the problems of Organic Unity, of Discreteness, of Discontinuity – the whole is not equal to the sum of the parts, comparisons of quantity fails us, small changes produce large effects, the assumptions of a uniform and homogeneous continuum are not satisfied. Thus the results of Mathematical Psychics turn out to be derivative, not fundamental, indexes, not measurements, first approximations at the best; and fallible indexes, dubious approximations at that, with much doubt added as to what, if anything, they are indexes or approximations of.

Where ‘New Keynesian’ and New Classical economists think that they can rigorously deduce the aggregate effects of (representative) actors with their reductionist microfoundational methodology, they have to put a blind eye on the emergent properties that characterize all open social and economic systems. The interaction between animal spirits, trust, confidence, institutions, etc., cannot be deduced or reduced to a question answerable on the individual level. Macroeconomic structures and phenomena have to be analyzed also on their own terms.

Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *