Guest post by Jeff Mosenkis of Innovations for Poverty Action. An attempt to measure and rank the most effective ways to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere ranked educating girls and family planning (globally) above green energy. Fewer unplanned births means fewer carbon footprints. (h/t Osman Siddiqi) On Monday, President Trump expanded the “global gag rule” to mean no funding can go to any NGO that also discusses abortion with beneficiaries anywhere in their operations. This expansion grows its...
Read More »Non-ergodic stationarity (wonkish)
Let’s say we have a stationary process. That does not guarantee that it is also ergodic. The long-run time average of a single output function of the stationary process may not converge to the expectation of the corresponding variables — and so the long-run time average may not equal the probabilistic (expectational) average. Say we have two coins, where coin A has a probability of 1/2 of coming up heads, and coin B has a probability of 1/4 of coming up heads. We pick either...
Read More »The laws of mathematics and economics
The laws of mathematics and economics Some commentators on this blog — and elsewhere — seem to have problems with yours truly’s critique of the overly debonair attitude with which mathematics is applied to economics. In case you think the critique is some odd outcome of heterodox idiosyncrasy, well, maybe you should think twice … Advertisements
Read More »Taylor series (student stuff)
Taylor series (student stuff) [embedded content] Advertisements
Read More »Mainstream economics — an emperor turned out to be naked
Mainstream economics — an emperor turned out to be naked The main reason why the teaching of microeconomics (or of “ micro foundations” of macroeconomics) has been called “autistic” is because it is increasingly impossible to discuss real-world economic questions with microeconomists – and with almost all neoclassical theorists. They are trapped in their system, and don’t in fact care about the outside world any more. If you consult any microeconomic...
Read More »You’re done Tommy boy!
You’re done Tommy boy! [embedded content] I really love this guy. With razor-sharp logic he immediately goes for the essentials. He has no time for bullshit. And neither should we! Advertisements
Read More »Formal mathematical modeling in economics — a dead-end
Formal mathematical modeling in economics — a dead-end Using formal mathematical modeling, mainstream economists sure can guarantee that the conclusions hold given the assumptions. However, the validity we get in abstract model worlds does not warrantly transfer to real world economies. Validity may be good, but it isn’t enough. From a realist perspective both relevance and soundness are sine qua non. In their search for validity, rigour and precision,...
Read More »The conformity of economics papers?
Noah Smith has a fantastic essay on the problem with economics papers. Some excerpts: …in practice, I think what often happens in econ is more like the following: 1. Some papers make structural models, observe that these models can fit (or sort-of fit) a couple of stylized facts, and call it a day. Economists who like these theories (based on intuition, plausibility, or the fact that their dissertation adviser made the model) then use them for policy predictions forever after, without ever...
Read More »Truth and economics (II)
Truth and economics (II) Reading some of the comments on my earlier post on the status of truth in ‘modern’ economics, yours truly came to think of Robert Solow’s assessment of ludicrously ‘post-real’ model assumptions … Suppose someone sits down where you are sitting right now and announces to me that he is Napoleon Bonaparte. The last thing I want to do with him is to get involved in a technical discussion of cavalry tactics at the battle of Austerlitz....
Read More »So much for the ’empirical’ revolution in economics
So much for the ’empirical’ revolution in economics Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words … Source: Merijn Knibbe Advertisements
Read More »