I ran across yet another article discussing how the r>gcondition constrains fiscal policy. (For those who are not big fans of this stuff, that means that the long-term average real rate of interest is greater than the long-term real GDP growth rate.) I explain in this short post why any analysis that is premised on these concepts makes no sense.... Bond Economics Why Specifying r, g Makes No Sense WhatsoeverBrian Romanchuk
Read More »Rishabh Kumar — Not just r > g but r + q >> g: Piketty meets Ricardo in the long run of Indian history
Many assets have the potential to become valuable without actual accumulation. Writing in the initial stages of capitalism, Ricardo recognized the unusual position which landlords occupy: they control a non-reproducible asset, which generates rents under expanded capital accumulation. These rents extract away from surplus value and get capitalized into higher land prices. His vision was partially invalidated by gains in agrarian productivity but the history of wealth-income ratios testifies...
Read More »Oscar Jorda — The rate of return on everything
Important. The rate of return on capital plays a pivotal role in shaping current macroeconomic debates. This column presents findings from a new dataset covering returns of major asset classes in the advanced economies over the last 150 years. The data offer new insights on several long-standing puzzles in economics, and uncover new relationships that seem at odds with some fundamental economic tenets. VOX - CEPR's Policy Portal The rate of return on everything Òscar Jordà, Katharina...
Read More »