Thursday , December 1 2022
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Why Specifying r, g Makes No Sense Whatsoever — Brian Romanchuk

Why Specifying r, g Makes No Sense Whatsoever — Brian Romanchuk

Summary:
I ran across yet another article discussing how the r>gcondition constrains fiscal policy. (For those who are not big fans of this stuff, that means that the long-term average real rate of interest is greater than the long-term real GDP growth rate.) I explain in this short post why any analysis that is premised on these concepts makes no sense.... Bond Economics Why Specifying r, g Makes No Sense WhatsoeverBrian Romanchuk

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Mike Norman writes Rishabh Kumar — Not just r > g but r + q >> g: Piketty meets Ricardo in the long run of Indian history

Mike Norman writes Oscar Jorda — The rate of return on everything

I ran across yet another article discussing how the r>gcondition constrains fiscal policy. (For those who are not big fans of this stuff, that means that the long-term average real rate of interest is greater than the long-term real GDP growth rate.) I explain in this short post why any analysis that is premised on these concepts makes no sense....
Bond Economics
Why Specifying r, g Makes No Sense Whatsoever
Brian Romanchuk
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *