by Summary:
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Trade deficit
Mike Norman writes Bond market now pricing in one 25 bps rate cut by Fed in 2025
New Economics Foundation writes What are we getting wrong about tax
Sandwichman writes The more this contradiction develops…
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...
Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR
— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018