by Summary:
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Taleb can see the idiocy of the results yes; but as of yet hasn't expressed a view or interest in the methodologies that lead to these distinctions... might make sense for a stochastic person like himself (vice a deterministic person)...
Seemingly these "idiots who think in labels" don't understand the aphorism, that is, don't get the difference between *expressing* with the use of labels and *thinking* in labels. https://t.co/lEbj0WmUGR
— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) October 27, 2018