Has Tyler Cowen or John Cochrane Ever Heard of Monopsony Power? I’m going to replicate one portion of a long winded rant about alleged cognitive dissonance: The argument for a minimum wage is that labor demand is inelastic — employers will hire the same number of workers. They will just absorb the higher wages or pass along the costs to customers. Workers get all the benefit. If labor demand is elastic, employers cut back on the number of employees. Of course, labor economists would recognize that John Cochrane’s entire post assumes a perfectly competitive labor market. One has to wonder about economists who have never even considered monopsony power.
Topics:
ProGrowthLiberal considers the following as important: Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Trends in Electric Cars a Global EV Outlook 2024
Bill Haskell writes Turning Retirement Accounts for the Middle Class Into a Billion Tax-Free Piggy Bank
Angry Bear writes Sorta a book review “Wall Street’s War on Workers”
Angry Bear writes Do we need to change the way we grow things, or change the way we eat?
Has Tyler Cowen or John Cochrane Ever Heard of Monopsony Power?
I’m going to replicate one portion of a long winded rant about alleged cognitive dissonance:
The argument for a minimum wage is that labor demand is inelastic — employers will hire the same number of workers. They will just absorb the higher wages or pass along the costs to customers. Workers get all the benefit. If labor demand is elastic, employers cut back on the number of employees.
Of course, labor economists would recognize that John Cochrane’s entire post assumes a perfectly competitive labor market. One has to wonder about economists who have never even considered monopsony power.