Has Tyler Cowen or John Cochrane Ever Heard of Monopsony Power? I’m going to replicate one portion of a long winded rant about alleged cognitive dissonance: The argument for a minimum wage is that labor demand is inelastic — employers will hire the same number of workers. They will just absorb the higher wages or pass along the costs to customers. Workers get all the benefit. If labor demand is elastic, employers cut back on the number of employees. Of course, labor economists would recognize that John Cochrane’s entire post assumes a perfectly competitive labor market. One has to wonder about economists who have never even considered monopsony power.
Topics:
ProGrowthLiberal considers the following as important: Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Geneva plans to pay NGO wages after US foreign aid freeze
Bill Haskell writes Industrial Policy
Angry Bear writes Inflation. How worried should we be?
Angry Bear writes Tariffs Driving Drug Prices Higher
Has Tyler Cowen or John Cochrane Ever Heard of Monopsony Power?
I’m going to replicate one portion of a long winded rant about alleged cognitive dissonance:
The argument for a minimum wage is that labor demand is inelastic — employers will hire the same number of workers. They will just absorb the higher wages or pass along the costs to customers. Workers get all the benefit. If labor demand is elastic, employers cut back on the number of employees.
Of course, labor economists would recognize that John Cochrane’s entire post assumes a perfectly competitive labor market. One has to wonder about economists who have never even considered monopsony power.