Thursday , December 19 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Live-blogging the Fifteenth Amendment: February 22, 1869

Live-blogging the Fifteenth Amendment: February 22, 1869

Summary:
Live-blogging the Fifteenth Amendment: February 22, 1869 On February 22, the Senate took up the revisions that the House of Representatives had made to their proposals from one week prior. The House had struck from the Senate’s version, as sent to the House, the section extending the protections of the Amendment to qualifications for office, as well as the companion Amendment reforming the Electoral College. Senator Stewart (Republican from Nevada) proposed that the Senate disagree with the House and send back the following version: The right of citizens of the United States to vote and hold office shall not be denied or abridged by any State on account of race, color, nativity, property, creed, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress by

Topics:
NewDealdemocrat considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Ken Melvin writes Public vs Private Wealth – Breaking Free

Angry Bear writes The Legacy of a Retiring Senator

Joel Eissenberg writes Pete Hegseth knows nothing about Marxism

Peter Radford writes The Geology of Economics?

Live-blogging the Fifteenth Amendment: February 22, 1869

On February 22, the Senate took up the revisions that the House of Representatives had made to their proposals from one week prior. The House had struck from the Senate’s version, as sent to the House, the section extending the protections of the Amendment to qualifications for office, as well as the companion Amendment reforming the Electoral College.

Senator Stewart (Republican from Nevada) proposed that the Senate disagree with the House and send back the following version:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote and hold office shall not be denied or abridged by any State on account of race, color, nativity, property, creed, or previous condition of servitude.

The Congress by appropriate legislation may enforce the provisions of this article.

Stewart moved that the Senate ask for a conference committee to iron out their differences. There was dismay that the House was insisting on having its exact way as to this amendment, as had been the case for the past number of years as to all legislation, and that the attempt to reconcile their differences might be futile.
The Senate decided to put off voting on the proposal for a day.
Source: Congressional Globe, 40th Congress, 3rd Session, pp. 1440-42.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *