Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Changing Budgetary Procedures: Outline Of The MMT Approach — Brian Romanchuk

Changing Budgetary Procedures: Outline Of The MMT Approach — Brian Romanchuk

Summary:
MMT criticism has shirted away from affordability (budget constraint) and fiscal responsibility (default constraint) to an inflation constraint and a curency devaluation constraint.While this is progress, it is probably an impass such as is encountered when theories and their models are founded on incompatible assumptions.On one hand, this is likely to lead to a revisiting of economic theory in light of criticism of neoclassical economics from Keynes, Paleo Keynesians, Post Keynesians and Institutionalists.On the other hand, neoclassical economists are never going to accept that inflation risk and foreign exchange risk can never be formalized to the standards they impose owing to the level of uncertainty that Keynes explicated by then. John Hicks and Paul Samuelson's interpretation of

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister

New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice

Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.

MMT criticism has shirted away from affordability (budget constraint) and fiscal responsibility (default constraint) to an inflation constraint and a curency devaluation constraint.

While this is progress, it is probably an impass such as is encountered when theories and their models are founded on incompatible assumptions.

On one hand, this is likely to lead to a revisiting of economic theory in light of criticism of neoclassical economics from Keynes, Paleo Keynesians, Post Keynesians and Institutionalists.

On the other hand, neoclassical economists are never going to accept that inflation risk and foreign exchange risk can never be formalized to the standards they impose owing to the level of uncertainty that Keynes explicated by then. John Hicks and Paul Samuelson's interpretation of Keynes were meant to reconcile Keynesianism with neoclassicism. We are still living with the results of that. Fail.

A lot of these folks are going to die holding on to those views, waiting for formal models that pass the criteria they arbitarily impose. And the harder and longer one digs in, the more difficult it becomes to admit mistake. (Some reputational risk would help.) Hopefully, the world will now begin to pass them by.

Bond Economics
Changing Budgetary Procedures: Outline Of The MMT Approach
Brian Romanchuk

Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *