by James K. Galbraith quote. It's a should-read.Should also read the article from which the quote is extracted.JKG draws a parallel between Keynes and Einstein, and neoclassical economics (which Keynes called classical economics) and Newton. He makes a case that Keynes was thinking specifically of this contrast when he mounted his criticism of the economics of his day, which remains the convention of today owing to the Paul Samuelson's "bastarding" Keynes contribution in his synthesis that became the basis for New Keynesianism, which is more John Hicks on Keynes than Keynes himself.Lars P. Syll’s BlogKeynesian vs Newtonian economicsLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Austrian Capital Theory And Triple-Switching In The Corn-Tractor Model
Mike Norman writes The Accursed Tariffs — NeilW
Mike Norman writes IRS has agreed to share migrants’ tax information with ICE
Mike Norman writes Trump’s “Liberation Day”: Another PR Gag, or Global Reorientation Turning Point? — Simplicius
James K. Galbraith quote. It's a should-read.
Should also read the article from which the quote is extracted.
JKG draws a parallel between Keynes and Einstein, and neoclassical economics (which Keynes called classical economics) and Newton. He makes a case that Keynes was thinking specifically of this contrast when he mounted his criticism of the economics of his day, which remains the convention of today owing to the Paul Samuelson's "bastarding" Keynes contribution in his synthesis that became the basis for New Keynesianism, which is more John Hicks on Keynes than Keynes himself.
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Keynesian vs Newtonian economics
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University