by Summary:
Looks like it a little bit, but we really have to get into January to see where this all flushes out. Probably not a problem for stocks.
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Looks like it a little bit, but we really have to get into January to see where this all flushes out. Probably not a problem for stocks.
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Post-real economics — a severe case of mathiness
New Economics Foundation writes Energy bills are falling – but the UK is still not protected from future price shocks
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Perché la trasformazione del capitalismo è necessaria
New Economics Foundation writes New Economics Podcast: Do we need to fight for the right to protest?
| Looks like it a little bit, but we really have to get into January to see where this all flushes out. Probably not a problem for stocks. |
Thank you Mike for all your great knowledge. Learning alot listing to you. I appreciate it. I'm learning not to panic when market goes down. Thanks so much. God bless. I hope you have a nice Christmas.
Medicare payments went up. Offsetting social security increase.
monster divergences
I have been in landscape business in Austin Tx since 1996. I have never seen business as slow as it is right now. Take it for what it's worth.
mike has all the right calls santa claus rally
Thank you Mike Norman for what you do
Omicron is a runny nose and headache, some get a fever. It actually acts as a vaccine because it's displacing the worse virus strains. The market has to realize this.
Aren't you the one who doubted and laughed at the thought of the Great Recession? You should do a class on how you were able to retain any credibility following that seeing as a few still depend on your thoughts.
Where have you been? That was over in a flash and never should have happened if the Fed had the correct policy response. Where's housing now? Where's the stock market now. All the correct calls I made, dummy.
@Mike Norman MMT Economics I'm the dummy? You are literally a meme of 'financial advice that aged like milk'. Again, this may be going over your head so feel free to record yourself laughing hysterically dismissing facts, happy to add it to the archive.
You charge $1250 per MONTH?? for a fucking e-mail newsletter? What a scam dude. gross
It's cheap. I'm gonna raise it to $2500. It's not for pikers like you. Go somewhere else. Maybe check Jim Cramer.
And it was $75/mo when I started it in 2016. Many people got on board at a lower price level. However, I have steadily increased it because it's a unique service. Applied MMT. Institutions pay upward of $50k per year for important research, so at $1250 it's quite cheap.
@Mike Norman MMT Economics No one charges more than a few dozen bucks per month for a newsletter. The fact that you're charging in the thousands is laughable. MMT is about making a people's economy. You don't
give a shit about the people charging this much for a lousy email every once in a while. yikes
@Mike Norman MMT Economics how about a discount for a common man like myself at 75$/month? Plus, I'll stop bugging you in the comments. That's a good offer