by Summary:
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).Cause causality is a bitch.Lars P. Syll’s BlogDebating the value of randomizationLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo Universityhttps://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).Cause causality is a bitch.Lars P. Syll’s BlogDebating the value of randomizationLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo Universityhttps://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Andreas Cervenka och den svenska bostadsbubblan
Mike Norman writes Trade deficit
Merijn T. Knibbe writes Christmas thoughts about counting the dead in zones of armed conflict.
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Debunking the balanced budget superstition
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.
Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).
Cause causality is a bitch.
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Debating the value of randomization
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
https://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Debating the value of randomization
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
https://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/