by Summary:
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).Cause causality is a bitch.Lars P. Syll’s BlogDebating the value of randomizationLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo Universityhttps://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).Cause causality is a bitch.Lars P. Syll’s BlogDebating the value of randomizationLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo Universityhttps://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Robert Vienneau writes Another Hayekian Triangle Not Supporting The Austrian School
Joel Eissenberg writes Access to medical care: right or privilege?
NewDealdemocrat writes Production turns more negative
Bill Haskell writes Lawler: Early Read on Existing Home Sales in October
This post is slightly longish and a bit wonkish, but important. It is summed up in a quote of Andrew Gelman that is cited in the argument.
Much of the literature in statistics, econometrics, and epidemiology on causal identification misses this point, by focusing on the procedures of scientific investigation—in particular, tools such as randomization and p-values which are intended to enforce rigor—without recognizing that rigor is empty without something to be rigorous about.In short, process (method) ends up getting confused with substance (fact).
Cause causality is a bitch.
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Debating the value of randomization
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
https://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/
Debating the value of randomization
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
https://larspsyll.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/debating-the-value-of-randomization/