Saturday , November 16 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Idaho Deputy Solicitor General Answering SCOTUS Justices on Idaho’s Abortion Law

Idaho Deputy Solicitor General Answering SCOTUS Justices on Idaho’s Abortion Law

Summary:
Listening to the back and forth between the justices and Idaho’s Solicitor General, there is tension on display here. The Idaho Solicitor General appears to take the stance the abortion is available if necessary. The justices are questioning how such could be if doctors will not treat the women if abortion is needed. That being, doctors believe they blocked by Idaho’s abortion law. Alito takes the chicken or the egg approach with US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. He describes “situations where it is not clear which of two events should be considered the cause and which should be considered the effect, to express a scenario of infinite regress, or to express the difficulty of sequencing actions where each seems to depend on others being . . .

Topics:
Bill Haskell considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Robert Skidelsky writes Speech in the House of Lords – Autumn Budget 2024

Merijn T. Knibbe writes Völkermord in Gaza. Two million deaths are in the cards.

Peter Radford writes Who brought us Trump?

NewDealdemocrat writes Real GDP for Q3 nicely positive, but long leading components mediocre to negative for the second quarter in a row

Listening to the back and forth between the justices and Idaho’s Solicitor General, there is tension on display here. The Idaho Solicitor General appears to take the stance the abortion is available if necessary. The justices are questioning how such could be if doctors will not treat the women if abortion is needed. That being, doctors believe they blocked by Idaho’s abortion law.

Alito takes the chicken or the egg approach with US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. He describes “situations where it is not clear which of two events should be considered the cause and which should be considered the effect, to express a scenario of infinite regress, or to express the difficulty of sequencing actions where each seems to depend on others being . . . ” US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar is accepting none of this. Listen to her argument rather hear it from me.

Barrett ‘shocked’ at ambiguity of Idaho argument (youtube.com)

Idaho Deputy Solicitor General Joshua N. Turner making an attempt to justify Idaho’s law on abortions.

‘She Was About To Die’: Justice Sotomayor Details Real Abortion Hypotheticals To Idaho Lawyer (youtube.com)
Elena Kagan Asks Lawyer Point Blank If He Disputes ‘Medical Standard Of Care’ In Idaho Abortion Case (youtube.com)
US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar v. Justice Samuel Alito. Prelogar’s exchange with Justice Alito – Idaho abortion arguments (youtube.com)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *