by Summary:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Peter Radford writes Election: Take Four
Bill Haskell writes Healthcare Insurance in the United States
Joel Eissenberg writes Seafood says global warming is not a hoax
Bill Haskell writes The Opioid Epidemic from 1980 Onward in My Words
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage.
Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets.
Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate