by Summary:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes They’re coming for Social Security
Bill Haskell writes Cannon ball don’t pay no mind . . .
Angry Bear writes Silence of the Lambs . . . Congress
Eric Kramer writes Do Democrats and progressives need a marriage counselor or a divorce lawyer?
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage.
Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets.
Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate