by Summary:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage. Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets. Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Journalism, politics, Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Bill Haskell writes Promoting the General Welfare, The Supreme Court’s Version of Doing So
Angry Bear writes Medicare Payment Advisory Commission report to Congress Brief
Angry Bear writes Western “Values”
Angry Bear writes Trends in Electric Cars a Global EV Outlook 2024
James Kwak writes Introductory economics can be more misleading than it is helpful (originally in Atlantic magazine). Tim Worstall responds with James Kwak sure doesn’t understand the economics of the minimum wage.
Peter Dorman explains Why you should never use a supply and demand diagram for labor markets.
Richard Wolff notes he thinks the debate is a distraction Beyond the minimum wage debate