by Summary:
Hahahahahahha!!! Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.” Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH — Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Hahahahahahha!!! Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.” Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH — Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes New Economics Podcast: Do we need to fight for the right to protest?
Robert Vienneau writes Future Papers For My Research Program?
Robert Skidelsky writes Full Employment, as the Hearth of the Cultural Economics of Orban
Matias Vernengo writes Debt cycles and the long term crisis of neoliberalism
hahahahahahha!!!
Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.”
Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH— Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017