by Summary:
Hahahahahahha!!! Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.” Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH — Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Hahahahahahha!!! Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.” Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH — Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
hahahahahahha!!!
Mulvaney recently said, according to Bloomberg. “If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.”
Now we need deficits! The ultimate charlatanism of Nick Mulvaney. https://t.co/lmKZ2xDODH— Tom Cooper (@NashvilleSpokes) October 4, 2017