by ProGowthLiberal concludes ‘no net increase’ on Saudi Arabian arms deal: The 9 billion in arms sales is for the next decade amounting to an additional billion in new exports on a per annum basis. So we are talking about only 0.06% of GDP in new exports but this only gets worse if we take Tillerson at his word that as the Saudis spend more on their own defense, we spend less. In other words, exports rise by billion per year and Federal purchases fall by billion per year. Good news from a deficit hawk perspective but no net increase in U.S. aggregate demand. So Trump’s “jobs, jobs, jobs” amounts to nothing but his usual political posturing.
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes How Tesla makes money
Angry Bear writes True pricing: effects on competition
Angry Bear writes The paradox of economic competition
Angry Bear writes USMAC Exempts Certain Items Coming out of Mexico and Canada
ProGowthLiberal concludes ‘no net increase’ on Saudi Arabian arms deal:
The $109 billion in arms sales is for the next decade amounting to an additional $11 billion in new exports on a per annum basis. So we are talking about only 0.06% of GDP in new exports but this only gets worse if we take Tillerson at his word that as the Saudis spend more on their own defense, we spend less. In other words, exports rise by $11 billion per year and Federal purchases fall by $11 billion per year. Good news from a deficit hawk perspective but no net increase in U.S. aggregate demand. So Trump’s “jobs, jobs, jobs” amounts to nothing but his usual political posturing.