By Steve Roth What Causes Recessions? A Physicists’ Complex Systems Model I received some very interesting comments from Yaneer Bar-Yam to my recent Evonomics post— “Capital’s Share of Income is Far Higher than You Think.” He pointed me to his very interesting paper, “Preliminary steps toward a universal economic dynamics for monetary and fiscal policy.” I’m using this space to reply with with some stuff that can’t display in that comments space. I haven’t gotten to the full-boat, multipart reply that I have floating in my head, but wanted to get back on two items for the nonce, a question plus a response on recession prediction: 1. What is the function in this model that “causes” capital gains? This always strikes me as the core problem in a complete SFC
Topics:
Dan Crawford considers the following as important: Taxes/regulation, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Bill Haskell writes The Opioid Epidemic from 1980 Onward in My Words
Angry Bear writes Subsidizing Fossil Fuels
Joel Eissenberg writes Tax cuts for the rich only increase wealth disparity
Angry Bear writes Authorization Requests
by Steve Roth
What Causes Recessions? A Physicists’ Complex Systems Model
I received some very interesting comments from Yaneer Bar-Yam to my recent Evonomics post— “Capital’s Share of Income is Far Higher than You Think.” He pointed me to his very interesting paper, “Preliminary steps toward a universal economic dynamics for monetary and fiscal policy.”
I’m using this space to reply with with some stuff that can’t display in that comments space.
I haven’t gotten to the full-boat, multipart reply that I have floating in my head, but wanted to get back on two items for the nonce, a question plus a response on recession prediction:
1. What is the function in this model that “causes” capital gains? This always strikes me as the core problem in a complete SFC model where flows (including holding gain “flows”) balance to and fully explain (change in) net worth: if you can write a reaction function that predicts asset-price changes, you’re a very rich person… ?
2. The recession-prediction based on investment/consumption ratio misses a bunch of recessions (false negatives). Contrasted here with a personal favorite: every recession since 1970 has been preceded by a year-over-year decline in real household total assets/net worth. (Including liabilities to arrive at net worth instead of just using assets adds no predictive value). Click for FRED.
This predictor is seven for seven. Though: there are two recent false positives — shortly following the 2001 and 2008 recessions.
The investment:consumption ratio bruited as a predictor/cause in the paper is four for seven, and even there: the first year of decline in this ratio seems late in each case (as opposed to the measure’s peak) to suggest it as a cause:
Investment:Consumption ratio peak/first year of decline | Year-over-year declines in real household net worth (CPI-adjusted; base year 82–84) | Quarters of real YOY net worth decline – YOY % decline in first declining quarter – NW decline peak-to-trough % | Beginning of NBER-dated recession |
Q4 1969 – Q4 1970 | 4 – 3.9 – 5.6 | Q1 1970 | |
Q4 1973 – Q1 1975 | 6 – 3.8 – 9.9 | Q1 1974 | |
Q1 1980 – Q2 1980 | 2 – 1.5 – 1.4 | Q1 1980 | |
1981/1982 | Q3 1981 – Q2 1982 | 4 – 1.8 – 1.0 | Q3 1981 |
1989/1990 | Q3 1990 – Q2 1991 | 4 – 3.2 – 1.9 | Q3 1990 |
2000/2001 | Q4 2000 – Q4 2001 | 5 – 2.0 – 8.1 | Q1 2001 |
Q2 2002 – Q1 2003 | 4 – 1.8 – 5.2 | ||
2007/2008 | Q4 2007 – Q3 2009 | 8 – 3.8 – 19.3 | Q1 2008 |
Q3 2011 – Q4 2011 |
I have various ideas and explanations for all this, but apologies, haven’t found time to write them all up.