Wednesday , December 18 2024
Home / The Angry Bear / Wisconsin ex-Dane and Milwaukee Counties

Wisconsin ex-Dane and Milwaukee Counties

Summary:
In comments to NDD’s post, Terry says: Wisconsin—except for Milwaukee and Madison —basically opened up with no restrictions as a result of the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling 4 weeks ago and much to the delight of the late night comics people flocked to taverns without regard of masks or social distancing. I certainly expected to see numbers bump up by now but in fact they have fallen steadily Cool if true, but, as Warner Wolf said, let’s go to the video tape data: author calculations from NYT County-level data I’m seeing a pop in cases about two to three weeks after the ruling, which rather matches Terry’s (and the world’s) initial expectations. If you look at the time after those two well-predicted spikes, they look as if they might—best case—return to

Topics:
Ken Houghton considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Bill Haskell writes The Economics of Killing Medicaid . . .

Angry Bear writes Healthcare in the United States

Bill Haskell writes US-China Decoupling

Bill Haskell writes KFF Health News’ Yearlong Study of How Government Decisions Undermine Black Americans Health

In comments to NDD’s post, Terry says:

Wisconsin—except for Milwaukee and Madison —basically opened up with no restrictions as a result of the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling 4 weeks ago and much to the delight of the late night comics people flocked to taverns without regard of masks or social distancing. I certainly expected to see numbers bump up by now but in fact they have fallen steadily

Cool if true, but, as Warner Wolf said, let’s go to the video tape data:

Wisconsin ex-Dane and Milwaukee Counties

author calculations from NYT County-level data

I’m seeing a pop in cases about two to three weeks after the ruling, which rather matches Terry’s (and the world’s) initial expectations.

If you look at the time after those two well-predicted spikes, they look as if they might—best case—return to the mid-May, still pre-“reopening” levels. This is most likely because large firms and stores and most non-alcoholics (unlike the gerrymandered abomination that is the lame-duck Wisconsin Supreme Court) are taking a cautious approach to returning people to work and restaurants and shops to full capacity (assuming they still have disposable income).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *