In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future. It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber). I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did Tags: Tomahawk missiles
Topics:
Robert Waldmann considers the following as important: history, Tomahawk missiles, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Ken Melvin writes A Developed Taste
Joel Eissenberg writes How Tesla makes money
Angry Bear writes True pricing: effects on competition
Angry Bear writes The paradox of economic competition
In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future.
It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber).
I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did