by In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future. It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber). I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did Tags: Tomahawk missiles
Topics:
Robert Waldmann considers the following as important: history, Tomahawk missiles, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Geneva plans to pay NGO wages after US foreign aid freeze
Bill Haskell writes Industrial Policy
Angry Bear writes Inflation. How worried should we be?
Bill Haskell writes Call It What it is, a Silent Coup
In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future.
It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber).
I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did