by In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future. It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber). I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did Tags: Tomahawk missiles
Topics:
Robert Waldmann considers the following as important: history, Tomahawk missiles, US/Global Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Merijn T. Knibbe writes ´Fryslan boppe´. An in-depth inspirational analysis of work rewarded with the 2024 Riksbank prize in economic sciences.
Angry Bear writes The only force holding Trump accountable for trying to interfere in the last election is the voters in the up coming one
Bill Haskell writes Opinion Piece “China’s One-Child Economic Disaster”
NewDealdemocrat writes “A Brave and Cunning Prince”
In 1980 I had a long argument with an unfortunate guy who didn’t just say “let’s agree to disagree” which sometimes works. He was arguing that the US should build B-1s, then the weapon of the future. I argued that the US should rely on Tomahawk missiles (launched from B-52s) which I asserted were the weapon of the future.
It is now what was in 1980 the future and guess what weapon was used yesterday (hint it wasn’t a B-1 bomber).
I love to say “I told you so” however, in this case I can’t. I can type “I told him so” and just did