Lars P. Syll

Krugman vs Syll on the IS-LM model Some time ago yours truly ventured to question Paul Krugman for his unadulterated devotion to the IS-LM model. For years self-proclaimed “proud neoclassicist” Paul Krugman had in endless harpings on the same IS-LM string told us about the splendour of the Hicksian invention. Krugman’s response contained nothing new. In an earlier post on his blog, Krugman had argued that ‘Keynesian’ macroeconomics more than anything else...

Marx and the Matthew effect People who are short of money are often desperate to borrow and so willing to pay high interest rates to loan-sharks, payday lenders or car finance companies. If you lack negotiating power, you’ll get a bad deal. This is an example of the Matthew effect … All of this means there’s some truth in the old cliché: “the rich get richer, the poor stay poor.” Although the ONS says that the UK has a relatively low rate of persistent...

How ‘New Keynesian’ economics betrays Keynes Unless you have a PhD in economics, you probably think it uncontroversial to argue that we should be concerned about the unemployment rate. Those of you who have lost a job, or who have struggled to find a job on leaving school, college, or a university, are well aware that unemployment is a painful and dehumanizing experience. You may be surprised to learn that, for the past thirty-five years, the models used by...

The perils of using Mickey Mouse models When mainstream economists comment on the status of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, the really interesting questions as a rule drown in the usual pseudo science mumbo jumbo of four-factor models with two mispricing factors being better-performing than three-factor models, etc., etc. Better read what Diane Coyle has to say about it: I would defend using the assumption of rational choice as long as one realises that it...

All Along The Watchtower (personal)  [embedded content] In loving memory of my brother Peter, a big Jimi Hendrix fan. div{float:left;margin-right:10px;} div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;} ]]> Advertisements

How to crush mainstream economics professors in debates  [embedded content] A must-see! And with a lesson to learn: being pompous and arrogant is of no avail when debating with smart and knowledgeable students … div{float:left;margin-right:10px;} div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;} ]]> Advertisements

How to filter obscurantist nonsense economics Following the greatest economic depression since the 1930s, Robert Solow in 2010 gave a prepared statement on “Building a Science of Economics for the Real World” for a hearing in the U. S. Congress. According to Solow modern macroeconomics has not only failed at solving present economic and financial problems, but is “bound” to fail. Building microfounded macromodels on “assuming the economy populated by a...

Jon Elster on mainstream economics — obscurant bullshit In the present article I consider the less frequently phenomenon of “hard obscurantism”, a species of the genus scholarly obscurantism. In academic debates, a more common term for obscurantism is “bullshit” … One may perhaps, distinguish between obscure writers and obscurantist writers. The former aim at truth, but do not respect the norms for arriving at truth, such as focusing on causality, acting as...

 [embedded content] div{float:left;margin-right:10px;} div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;} ]]> Advertisements

Why not even Paul Krugman is a real Keynesian Keynes’s insights have enormous practical importance, according to Lance Taylor and Duncan Foley … But isn’t Keynes now mainstream? No, say Foley and Taylor. The mainstream still sees economies as inherently moving to an optimal equilibrium … It still says demand causes short-run fluctuations, but only supply factors, such as the capital stock and technology, can affect long-run growth. EVEN PAUL KRUGMAN, a...