by Angus Deaton gets Nobel prize in economics Not bad at all. Deaton has made very interesting contributions to many fields in economics. The one below — on the restricted applicability of RCTs — is one of my favourites: [embedded content] An area where Deaton has made significant contributions is income and consumption modeling. Here he has always shown a healthy doubt about the value of microfounded representative actors models: I realized, after a lot of agonizing and checking my imperfect understanding of time series analysis, that one common version of the representative agent permanent income model made no sense … This work taught me something important, that representative agent models are as dangerous and misleading as they are unrealistic. And yes, just for the record, I still think the prize should be dumped.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Andreas Cervenka och den svenska bostadsbubblan
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Debunking the balanced budget superstition
Lars Pålsson Syll writes How inequality causes financial crises
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Income inequality and the saving glut of the rich
Angus Deaton gets Nobel prize in economics
Not bad at all. Deaton has made very interesting contributions to many fields in economics. The one below — on the restricted applicability of RCTs — is one of my favourites:
An area where Deaton has made significant contributions is income and consumption modeling. Here he has always shown a healthy doubt about the value of microfounded representative actors models:
I realized, after a lot of agonizing and checking my imperfect understanding of time series analysis, that one common version of the representative agent permanent income model made no sense … This work taught me something important, that representative agent models are as dangerous and misleading as they are unrealistic.
And yes, just for the record, I still think the prize should be dumped.