by Denmark’s euro problem Denmark has combined high taxes and strong social benefits (free college, heavily subsidized child care, and more) with strong employment and high productivity. It shows that strong welfare states can work. But it is worth noting that Denmark has had a fairly bad run since the global financial crisis, with a severe slump and a very weak recovery. In fact, real GDP per capita is about as far below pre-crisis levels as that of Portugal or Spain, although with much less suffering. What’s going on? Part of the answer may be high levels of household debt. But Sweden has high private debt, too, and (despite its monetary missteps) has done much, much better. My interpretation is that Denmark is paying a high price for shadowing the euro — it hasn’t joined, but it runs monetary policy as if it had — and also, for the past few years, for imposing a lot of fiscal austerity despite very low borrowing costs. None of this has much bearing on the welfare state issue: short-run macro policy is a different subject. But just in case you wanted to think of Denmark as a role model across the board, this is a useful reminder.
Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Economics
This could be interesting, too:
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Daniel Waldenströms rappakalja om ojämlikheten
Peter Radford writes AJR, Nobel, and prompt engineering
Lars Pålsson Syll writes MMT explained
Lars Pålsson Syll writes Statens finanser funkar inte som du tror
Denmark’s euro problem
Denmark has combined high taxes and strong social benefits (free college, heavily subsidized child care, and more) with strong employment and high productivity. It shows that strong welfare states can work.
But it is worth noting that Denmark has had a fairly bad run since the global financial crisis, with a severe slump and a very weak recovery. In fact, real GDP per capita is about as far below pre-crisis levels as that of Portugal or Spain, although with much less suffering. What’s going on?
Part of the answer may be high levels of household debt. But Sweden has high private debt, too, and (despite its monetary missteps) has done much, much better.
My interpretation is that Denmark is paying a high price for shadowing the euro — it hasn’t joined, but it runs monetary policy as if it had — and also, for the past few years, for imposing a lot of fiscal austerity despite very low borrowing costs.
None of this has much bearing on the welfare state issue: short-run macro policy is a different subject. But just in case you wanted to think of Denmark as a role model across the board, this is a useful reminder.
