Top 10 RCT critiques

Summary:
Top 10 RCT critiques •Basu, Kaushik (2014) Randomisation, Causality and the Role of Reasoned Intuition •Cartwright, Nancy  (2010) What are randomised controlled trials good for? •Cartwright, Nancy & Hardie, Jeremy (2012) Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better •Deaton, Angus (2009 ) Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development •Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy (2016) Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials •Freedman, David (2006) Statistical models for causation: what inferential leverage do they provide? •Heckman, James & Urzua, Sergio (2009) Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify •Leamer, Edward (2010) Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia •Ravaillon, Martin (2009) Should the Randomistas Rule? •Scriven, Michael (2008) A Summative Evaluation of RCT Methodology: & An Alternative Approach to Causal Research

Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important: Economics

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Schuldenbremse bye bye

Lars Pålsson Syll writes What’s wrong with economics — a primer

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Krigskeynesianismens återkomst

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors (student stuff)