Tuesday , November 5 2024
Home / Lars P. Syll / Top 10 RCT critiques

Top 10 RCT critiques

Summary:
Top 10 RCT critiques •Basu, Kaushik (2014) Randomisation, Causality and the Role of Reasoned Intuition •Cartwright, Nancy  (2010) What are randomised controlled trials good for? •Cartwright, Nancy & Hardie, Jeremy (2012) Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better •Deaton, Angus (2009 ) Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development •Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy (2016) Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials •Freedman, David (2006) Statistical models for causation: what inferential leverage do they provide? •Heckman, James & Urzua, Sergio (2009) Comparing IV With Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify •Leamer, Edward (2010) Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia •Ravaillon, Martin (2009) Should the Randomistas Rule? •Scriven, Michael (2008) A Summative Evaluation of RCT Methodology: & An Alternative Approach to Causal Research

Topics:
Lars Pålsson Syll considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Daniel Waldenströms rappakalja om ojämlikheten

Peter Radford writes AJR, Nobel, and prompt engineering

Lars Pålsson Syll writes MMT explained

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Statens finanser funkar inte som du tror

Top 10 RCT critiques

Top 10 RCT critiques

•Basu, Kaushik (2014) Randomisation, Causality and the Role of Reasoned Intuition

Lars Pålsson Syll
Professor at Malmö University. Primary research interest - the philosophy, history and methodology of economics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *