by Summary:
Fun if you are interested in Joan Robinson, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Cambridge of the Twenties, and enjoy personal anecdotes. Incidentally, I am surprised and not surprised that Joan Robinson confessed to not understand the first propositions of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. I am not surprised in that they sound like metaphysical statements and many if not most readers are at least initially confused by this appearance. I am surprised, however, than Robinson did not realize that they are logical propositions and therefore definitions, rules or, tautologies rather than descriptive statements. Taking the Tractatus as a metaphysical work is like taking Euclid's Elements as a metaphysical work instead of a mathematical one. Moreover, it contradicts what Wittgenstein
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: History of Economics, Joan Robinson, john maynard keynes, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Piero Sraffa
This could be interesting, too:
Fun if you are interested in Joan Robinson, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Cambridge of the Twenties, and enjoy personal anecdotes. Incidentally, I am surprised and not surprised that Joan Robinson confessed to not understand the first propositions of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. I am not surprised in that they sound like metaphysical statements and many if not most readers are at least initially confused by this appearance. I am surprised, however, than Robinson did not realize that they are logical propositions and therefore definitions, rules or, tautologies rather than descriptive statements. Taking the Tractatus as a metaphysical work is like taking Euclid's Elements as a metaphysical work instead of a mathematical one. Moreover, it contradicts what Wittgenstein
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: History of Economics, Joan Robinson, john maynard keynes, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Piero Sraffa
This could be interesting, too:
Steve Roth writes John Maynard Keynes Doesn’t Seem to Know What He Means by the Word “Spending”
Matias Vernengo writes What’s the deal with The Smiths
Matias Vernengo writes Review of Crotty’s “Keynes Against Capitalism” (forthcoming in ROKE)
Matias Vernengo writes The American Political Economy Tradition
Incidentally, I am surprised and not surprised that Joan Robinson confessed to not understand the first propositions of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. I am not surprised in that they sound like metaphysical statements and many if not most readers are at least initially confused by this appearance.
I am surprised, however, than Robinson did not realize that they are logical propositions and therefore definitions, rules or, tautologies rather than descriptive statements.
Taking the Tractatus as a metaphysical work is like taking Euclid's Elements as a metaphysical work instead of a mathematical one. Moreover, it contradicts what Wittgenstein says in the final propositions, as well as his purpose in offering an alternative to Russell and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica, which in Wittgenstein's view had foundered on the theory of types.
There is also an anecdote that Joan Robinson tells about Piero Sraffa's influence on Wittgenstein's later work, which Wittgenstein himself credited.
Cambridge was certainly an interesting place in those years.
Real-World Economics Review Blog
My evening with Joan Robinson and the Tractatus
Edward Fullbrook