Summary:
A very simple reason that there may be decreasing returns to scale is transaction costs increasing for a variety of reasons, some of which may not be well explained. Scaling up micro to the macro level risks running into the fallacy of composition since systems operate differently at different scales — as J. M Keynes observed with the paradox of thrift.Information Transfer Economics The replication argument Jason Smith
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: fallacy of composition, returns to scale, transaction cost
This could be interesting, too:
A very simple reason that there may be decreasing returns to scale is transaction costs increasing for a variety of reasons, some of which may not be well explained. Scaling up micro to the macro level risks running into the fallacy of composition since systems operate differently at different scales — as J. M Keynes observed with the paradox of thrift.Information Transfer Economics The replication argument Jason Smith
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: fallacy of composition, returns to scale, transaction cost
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Simon Wren-Lewis — Neoliberalism: How Seeing Markets as Perfect Turned into an Ideology Justifying Crony Capitalism
Mike Norman writes Chris Dillow — Outsourcing: a transactions cost approach
Mike Norman writes Nathan McDonald — Bitcoin Proves You Cannot Have Your Digital Cake and Eat it Too
Jodi Beggs writes Technically, “constant returns to scale” describes a…
Scaling up micro to the macro level risks running into the fallacy of composition since systems operate differently at different scales — as J. M Keynes observed with the paradox of thrift.
Information Transfer Economics
The replication argument
Jason Smith
Jason Smith