by Summary:
Short review of Stephen Smith's Russia in Revolution, An Empire in Crisis, 1890-1928. Conclusion. Since the new war against Russia began in 2014, it has been the foreign plan that if enough pain is inflicted on the Russian people economically, especially their businessmen, they will rebel against their leaders in the Kremlin. Combined with economic warfare and fighting on the Syrian and Ukrainian fronts, the plan also calls for a home-front campaign against the corruption of Russian capitalism, its cronies in the Kremlin, and the party of thieves and swindlers which dominates the State Duma. Smith’s history demonstrates why this is bound to fail. In time, the irony will be obvious that a century of US Government schemes for regime change in Russia have come to nought, except in one
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Russian history, Russian Revolution, US foreign policy
This could be interesting, too:
Short review of Stephen Smith's Russia in Revolution, An Empire in Crisis, 1890-1928. Conclusion. Since the new war against Russia began in 2014, it has been the foreign plan that if enough pain is inflicted on the Russian people economically, especially their businessmen, they will rebel against their leaders in the Kremlin. Combined with economic warfare and fighting on the Syrian and Ukrainian fronts, the plan also calls for a home-front campaign against the corruption of Russian capitalism, its cronies in the Kremlin, and the party of thieves and swindlers which dominates the State Duma. Smith’s history demonstrates why this is bound to fail. In time, the irony will be obvious that a century of US Government schemes for regime change in Russia have come to nought, except in one
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Russian history, Russian Revolution, US foreign policy
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes Biden’s Foreign Policy Teams Hints at War with China, Conflict with Russia — Alan Macleod
Mike Norman writes The Foreign Policy Establishment Is Hijacking Impeachment — Jeet Heer
Mike Norman writes Maj. Tulsi Gabbard receives surprise deployment orders to Antarctica [satire] — Yossarian
Mike Norman writes America’s dangerous game of involving superpowers into their internal political struggles Drago Bosnic
Since the new war against Russia began in 2014, it has been the foreign plan that if enough pain is inflicted on the Russian people economically, especially their businessmen, they will rebel against their leaders in the Kremlin. Combined with economic warfare and fighting on the Syrian and Ukrainian fronts, the plan also calls for a home-front campaign against the corruption of Russian capitalism, its cronies in the Kremlin, and the party of thieves and swindlers which dominates the State Duma. Smith’s history demonstrates why this is bound to fail.
In time, the irony will be obvious that a century of US Government schemes for regime change in Russia have come to nought, except in one place today – that’s in Washington, DC, where a revolt against the sitting president, not seen since the American civil war, is under way. Until the American war against Russia collapses for domestic American reasons, all the war does is to make Russian regime change less likely. The unequal price Russians are paying for this war will continue growing, but the history lesson is that Putin is bound to grow stronger unless he makes Tsar Nicholas or Kerensky-sized mistakes.
Dances with Bears
Beggared for Choice – the History of Russia’s 1917 Revolutions as Guide to What Happens Next
John Helmer
Beggared for Choice – the History of Russia’s 1917 Revolutions as Guide to What Happens Next
John Helmer