Thursday , November 21 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Moon of Alabama — British Involvement In “Trump Dossier” Needs Further Investigation

Moon of Alabama — British Involvement In “Trump Dossier” Needs Further Investigation

Summary:
Michael Sussmann, a lawyer from the same firm that hired Fusion GPS on order of Democrats, hired the Crowdstrike cyber-outlet to investigate the leak of DNC emails. Crowdstrike and the DNC denied the FBI access to the relevant servers but asserted that "Russian hacking" was the source of the leak.... The fake dossier, paid for by the Democrats, was used by the FBI under Obama to get FISA warrants to spy on Republican party operatives. We noted in January that the dossier was additionally used by the British and American deep state to sabotage Trump's plans for better relations with Russia (see original for source quotes): Anyone see a pattern here?Moon reminds us of the history. It's a story of intrigue that will likely be a movie someday.Was this an attempted coup d'etat?And it

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Mike Norman writes Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results? — Alan I. Abramowitz

Mike Norman writes Concord Management and the End of Russiagate? — David Lazare

Mike Norman writes Adam Carter — “Mueller Report – Expensive Estimations And Elusive Evidence”

Mike Norman writes Ray McGovern — Orwellian Cloud Hovers Over Russia-gate

Michael Sussmann, a lawyer from the same firm that hired Fusion GPS on order of Democrats, hired the Crowdstrike cyber-outlet to investigate the leak of DNC emails. Crowdstrike and the DNC denied the FBI access to the relevant servers but asserted that "Russian hacking" was the source of the leak....
The fake dossier, paid for by the Democrats, was used by the FBI under Obama to get FISA warrants to spy on Republican party operatives.
We noted in January that the dossier was additionally used by the British and American deep state to sabotage Trump's plans for better relations with Russia (see original for source quotes):
Anyone see a pattern here?

Moon reminds us of the history. It's a story of intrigue that will likely be a movie someday.

Was this an attempted coup d'etat?

And it appears that MI6 and the British government was involved, too.

Putting it all together, the bipartisan establishment worked to undermine that non-establishment candidates, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, and then sought to undermine Trump's presidency.

These are very serious allegations.

Is the Russiagate brouhaha designed not only to undermine democracy but also to distract from and cover up the attempt to do so? Were the British involved to make this operation more difficult to trace?

The last Steele report was not paid for by the DNC. It was delivered to British government and to John McCain. The purpose of this last report was to plant false evidence that Trump paid for "Russian hacking". There is a strong cooperation between U.S. and British intelligence.
Why were the highest levels of the British government involved in the "private investigation" that resulted in the Steele dossier. Did the Brits act on their own initiative or were they cut-outs for U.S. intelligence circles, especially for Obama's consigliere and CIA director John Brennan?
It his time for Congress to dig deeper into the undue British influence in this whole affair.
The Republicans are on the case.


The Hill
GOP seizes on new Clinton revelation
Jonathan Easley
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *