by Summary:
Ten years ago, John Mearsheimer and I published a controversial article and subsequent book examining the impact of the “Israel Lobby” — that is, a loose coalition of pro-Israel individuals and organizations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Christians United for Israel, just to name a few. We argued that decades of unconditional U.S. support for Israel — the so-called “special relationship” — is not explained by U.S. strategic interests or by shared values, as is often claimed, but is due primarily to the political efforts and activities of the lobby. The result, we also argued, does more harm than good to both the United States and Israel. For the United States, the “special relationship”
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: foreign influence, neocons, the Israel lobby, US foreign policy
This could be interesting, too:
Ten years ago, John Mearsheimer and I published a controversial article and subsequent book examining the impact of the “Israel Lobby” — that is, a loose coalition of pro-Israel individuals and organizations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Christians United for Israel, just to name a few. We argued that decades of unconditional U.S. support for Israel — the so-called “special relationship” — is not explained by U.S. strategic interests or by shared values, as is often claimed, but is due primarily to the political efforts and activities of the lobby. The result, we also argued, does more harm than good to both the United States and Israel. For the United States, the “special relationship”
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: foreign influence, neocons, the Israel lobby, US foreign policy
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Tom Palley on the Causes and Consequences of the War in Ukraine
Matias Vernengo writes The US and Russia: beware of Neocons and liberals preaching democracy promotion
Mike Norman writes Biden’s Foreign Policy Teams Hints at War with China, Conflict with Russia — Alan Macleod
Mike Norman writes The Foreign Policy Establishment Is Hijacking Impeachment — Jeet Heer
Ten years ago, John Mearsheimer and I published a controversial article and subsequent book examining the impact of the “Israel Lobby” — that is, a loose coalition of pro-Israel individuals and organizations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Christians United for Israel, just to name a few. We argued that decades of unconditional U.S. support for Israel — the so-called “special relationship” — is not explained by U.S. strategic interests or by shared values, as is often claimed, but is due primarily to the political efforts and activities of the lobby.
The result, we also argued, does more harm than good to both the United States and Israel. For the United States, the “special relationship” undermines America’s standing in the Arab and Islamic worlds, has encouraged a more confrontational approach with Iran and Syria, and contributes significantly both to America’s terrorism problem and to needless and costly debacles like the 2003 invasion of Iraq. For Israel, unquestioning U.S. support for almost all its actions has allowed the decades-long subjugation of the Palestinians to continue unchecked, undermining the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and threatening Israel’s future as a democratic and/or Jewish state.
We made it clear the lobby was not a monolith controlling every aspect of U.S. Middle East policy, but rather a collection of disparate groups and individuals united by the aim of defending Israel’s actions and deepening the special relationship. We explicitly rejected the idea that anything nefarious was going on, explaining that AIPAC and related organizations were simply part of a powerful interest group like the farm lobby or the National Rifle Association. Their efforts to influence U.S. policy are “as American as apple pie.” And we used the term “Israel lobby” to highlight that not all American Jews support these policies and that some key members of the lobby (such as Christian Zionists) aren’t Jewish. The book also emphasizes that none of these groups or individuals is solely responsible for the choices U.S. leaders make....Forward
That ‘Israel Lobby’ Controversy? History Has Proved Us Right
Stephen M. Walt
See also
THE ISRAEL LOBBY AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY (PDF)
John J. Mearsheimer, professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
John J. Mearsheimer, professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
The Israel Lobby (PDF)
John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt