Summary:
Some views on distinguishing critics from cranks and quacks.ChrisAuld18 signs you’re reading bad criticism of economics Chris Auld Unlearning Economics 18 Signs Economists Haven’t the Foggiest Information Transfer Economics18 signs you are not having a productive conversation about economicsJason Smith Dani Rodrik's WeblogThe Economics Debate, again and again Dani Rodrik
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: economics profession
This could be interesting, too:
Some views on distinguishing critics from cranks and quacks.ChrisAuld18 signs you’re reading bad criticism of economics Chris Auld Unlearning Economics 18 Signs Economists Haven’t the Foggiest Information Transfer Economics18 signs you are not having a productive conversation about economicsJason Smith Dani Rodrik's WeblogThe Economics Debate, again and again Dani Rodrik
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: economics profession
This could be interesting, too:
Mike Norman writes REVIEW ESSAY–The Reformation in Economics: A Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Economic Theory by Philip Pilkington Marc Morgan
Mike Norman writes Three Economic Ideas Threatening to Defenders of the Status Quo — Peter Cooper
Mike Norman writes Bill Mitchell — Be careful of what parades as academic research (Uber)
Mike Norman writes Political Economy? — Peter Radford
ChrisAuld
18 signs you’re reading bad criticism of economics
Chris Auld
Unlearning Economics
18 Signs Economists Haven’t the Foggiest18 signs you are not having a productive conversation about economics
Jason Smith
The Economics Debate, again and again
Dani Rodrik