Thursday , April 18 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Zero Hedge — Leaked Descriptions Of Infamous “Russia Ads” Derail Collusion Narrative “They Showed Support For Clinton”

Zero Hedge — Leaked Descriptions Of Infamous “Russia Ads” Derail Collusion Narrative “They Showed Support For Clinton”

Summary:
That was quick. Less than a week after Facebook agreed to turn over to Congressional investigators copies of the 3,000-odd political advertisements that the company said it had inadvertently sold to a Russia-linked group intent on meddling in the 2016 presidential election, the contents of the ads have – unsurprisingly – leaked, just as we had expected them to. No smoking gun. Zero HedgeLeaked Descriptions Of Infamous "Russia Ads" Derail Collusion Narrative "They Showed Support For Clinton" Tyler Durden The 2016 election outcome was unpredictable not only because of Donald Trump's presidential victory, but in terms where the money went. According to a new report from media tracker Borrell Associates, the final tally of political campaign ad spending in the 2016 election cycle came in

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Mike Norman writes My new podcast episode is out.

Sergio Cesaratto writes Video, ancora sulla Corte tedesca

Mike Norman writes Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales has quietly launched a Facebook rival social network — Tap Team

Mike Norman writes Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results? — Alan I. Abramowitz

That was quick.
Less than a week after Facebook agreed to turn over to Congressional investigators copies of the 3,000-odd political advertisements that the company said it had inadvertently sold to a Russia-linked group intent on meddling in the 2016 presidential election, the contents of the ads have – unsurprisingly – leaked, just as we had expected them to.
No smoking gun.

Zero Hedge
Leaked Descriptions Of Infamous "Russia Ads" Derail Collusion Narrative "They Showed Support For Clinton"
Tyler Durden
The 2016 election outcome was unpredictable not only because of Donald Trump's presidential victory, but in terms where the money went. According to a new report from media tracker Borrell Associates, the final tally of political campaign ad spending in the 2016 election cycle came in lower than anticipated -- at $9.8 billion. And, while broadcast TV retained its dominance, the mass media mainstay of political advertising took a big blow from more targetable and data-driven ad options such as cable TV and digital.
The premise that $100,000 to $150,000 spent on FaceBook ads exerted much of an influence at all on the presidential election is simply absurd, let alone a dominant influence. This is not reaching for straws. It is jumping the shark.

AdAge

Kate Kaye

Censorship in the works.


Another paradox of liberalism.

Fortune
How Facebook, Google Handle Political Ads Will Inevitably Change, Marketers Say
Reuters


Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *