Summary:
Adam Smith thought there were two economies – meritocratic for the poor and powerless and anti-meritocratic for the powerful. There is also a legal double-standard of justice reflecting this. Steal a hundred go to jail; steal a million, get promoted. Accountability is inversely proportional to status? Stumbling and MumblingAdam Smith's two economiesChris Dillow | Investors Chronicle
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Adam Smith, double standard
This could be interesting, too:
Adam Smith thought there were two economies – meritocratic for the poor and powerless and anti-meritocratic for the powerful. There is also a legal double-standard of justice reflecting this. Steal a hundred go to jail; steal a million, get promoted. Accountability is inversely proportional to status? Stumbling and MumblingAdam Smith's two economiesChris Dillow | Investors Chronicle
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Adam Smith, double standard
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes “The Many Faces of Adam Smith”
Matias Vernengo writes What’s the deal with The Smiths
Matias Vernengo writes Classical Political Economy or the Surplus Approach
Matias Vernengo writes The worldly philosophers go to Washington: Episode 3, Farmer and Merchants
Adam Smith thought there were two economies – meritocratic for the poor and powerless and anti-meritocratic for the powerful.
There is also a legal double-standard of justice reflecting this. Steal a hundred go to jail; steal a million, get promoted.
Accountability is inversely proportional to status?