by Summary:
First there was the Great Gatsby curve. Then there was the Proust index. Now, thanks to Neil Irwin, we have the Marx ratio. Each, in their different way, attempts to capture the ravages of contemporary capitalism. But the Marx ratio is a bit different. It was published in the New York Times. Its aim is to capture one of the underlying determinants of the obscene levels of inequality in the United States today—not class mobility or the number of years of national income growth lost to the global financial crash. And, of course, it takes its name from that ruthless nineteenth-century critic of mainstream economics and capitalism itself.... Occasional Links & CommentaryMarx ratio David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre DameSee also Putting aside this rich line-up of
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: capital share, inequality, Karl Marx, labor expropriation, labor share, Marx ratio, Marxian Economics, Marxism, Neil Irwin, surplus value
This could be interesting, too:
First there was the Great Gatsby curve. Then there was the Proust index. Now, thanks to Neil Irwin, we have the Marx ratio. Each, in their different way, attempts to capture the ravages of contemporary capitalism. But the Marx ratio is a bit different. It was published in the New York Times. Its aim is to capture one of the underlying determinants of the obscene levels of inequality in the United States today—not class mobility or the number of years of national income growth lost to the global financial crash. And, of course, it takes its name from that ruthless nineteenth-century critic of mainstream economics and capitalism itself.... Occasional Links & CommentaryMarx ratio David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre DameSee also Putting aside this rich line-up of
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: capital share, inequality, Karl Marx, labor expropriation, labor share, Marx ratio, Marxian Economics, Marxism, Neil Irwin, surplus value
This could be interesting, too:
Joel Eissenberg writes Pete Hegseth knows nothing about Marxism
Stavros Mavroudeas writes COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccine Imperialism – Review of Radical Political Economics
Robert Vienneau writes William Baumol On Marx
Robert Skidelsky writes The Roots of Europe’s Immigration Problem – Project Syndicate
First there was the Great Gatsby curve. Then there was the Proust index. Now, thanks to Neil Irwin, we have the Marx ratio.
Each, in their different way, attempts to capture the ravages of contemporary capitalism. But the Marx ratio is a bit different. It was published in the New York Times. Its aim is to capture one of the underlying determinants of the obscene levels of inequality in the United States today—not class mobility or the number of years of national income growth lost to the global financial crash. And, of course, it takes its name from that ruthless nineteenth-century critic of mainstream economics and capitalism itself....
Occasional Links & Commentary
Marx ratio
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
Marx’s Birthday and the Dismal Science: A Few Observations
Carolina Alves and Ingrid H. Kvangraven
Marx ratio
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
See also
Putting aside this rich line-up of events, what has caught our attention is the equal proliferation of pieces celebrating Marx’s birthday, for the better or for the worse. From misleading and derogatory articles such as the Rulers of the world: read Karl Marx! published by The Economist to educational short pieces such as Cooper’s It’s time to normalize Karl Marx, it is difficult to not wonder about the reasons behind such opposing views. Similarly, it is difficult to resist the temptation to add a little contribution to the debate. So here we are.…Developing Economics
Marx’s Birthday and the Dismal Science: A Few Observations