by Interesting post on the current state of National Income Accounting from the CFR people out yesterday... 'must read' for us imo.... And the timing is interesting as Tim Cook has a meeting with Trump on the same day... hmmmm....Maybe Cook was having to explain what is REALLY going on to the Trump people? Which is not accurately being depicted/illustrated by the current national accounting abstractions? Kudlow the History major will be well over his head here for sure... maybe not Navarro and Ross....Maybe it would have been a good idea to go over these issues BEFORE the passage of the Jan. 1 tax law that radically adjusted corporate tax policy.... I don't think those tax changes were well thought out in advance and are leading to some at least short term problems... A U.S.
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
NewDealdemocrat writes March JOLTS report: declines in everything, fortunately including layoffs
NewDealdemocrat writes Manufacturing treads water in April, while real construction spending turned down in March (UPDATE: and heavy truck sales weren’t so great either)
Eric Kramer writes Eric Segall tells us what he really thinks about the Roberts court
Angry Bear writes Supreme Court watchers mollified themselves (and others) with vague promises
Interesting post on the current state of National Income Accounting from the CFR people out yesterday... 'must read' for us imo.... And the timing is interesting as Tim Cook has a meeting with Trump on the same day... hmmmm....
Maybe Cook was having to explain what is REALLY going on to the Trump people? Which is not accurately being depicted/illustrated by the current national accounting abstractions? Kudlow the History major will be well over his head here for sure... maybe not Navarro and Ross....
Maybe it would have been a good idea to go over these issues BEFORE the passage of the Jan. 1 tax law that radically adjusted corporate tax policy.... I don't think those tax changes were well thought out in advance and are leading to some at least short term problems...
A U.S. multinational would transfer (sell) IP assets to one of its Irish subsidiaries, thus allowing it to collect the profits associated with those assets. It would then transfer the profits to the second Irish subsidiary, which despite being incorporated in Ireland was “managed and controlled” from Bermuda (or another tax haven) and owned by the Bermuda subsidiary. Differences in the U.S. and Irish tax codes meant that the U.S. considered this subsidiary an Irish company while the Irish tax code considered it a Bermuda company—effectively leaving the company a tax resident of...nowhere.
A deep dive into Ireland's balance of payments by my colleague @ColeVFrank.— Brad Setser (@Brad_Setser) April 25, 2018After an (unnamed) large contract manufacturer transformed itself into an Irish tax resident in 2015, Ireland's trade data stopped saying much about Ireland ... https://t.co/hrzImBLV50