by Summary:
Typically, Washington is against anything that benefits Moscow, and is for anything which bolsters the position of US puppet regime Ukraine. But, at ongoing cases before the World Trade Organization, that narrative isn’t applicable. This is so because if Washington slam Moscow for its actions relative to Kiev, it would provide a case against Trump’s metals tariffs. However, by standing with Russia on this issue, Washington thinks that it can save its own trade actions, namely Trump’s metals tariffs.… National security trumps WTO regs. Both the US and Russia are claiming national security supervenes in their cases, and the US is supporting Russia on this. In effect, this is the recognition that the national sovereignty supersedes international agreements in certain cases. The nation
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Free Trade, national security, national sovereignty, WTO
This could be interesting, too:
Typically, Washington is against anything that benefits Moscow, and is for anything which bolsters the position of US puppet regime Ukraine. But, at ongoing cases before the World Trade Organization, that narrative isn’t applicable. This is so because if Washington slam Moscow for its actions relative to Kiev, it would provide a case against Trump’s metals tariffs. However, by standing with Russia on this issue, Washington thinks that it can save its own trade actions, namely Trump’s metals tariffs.… National security trumps WTO regs. Both the US and Russia are claiming national security supervenes in their cases, and the US is supporting Russia on this. In effect, this is the recognition that the national sovereignty supersedes international agreements in certain cases. The nation
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Free Trade, national security, national sovereignty, WTO
This could be interesting, too:
Angry Bear writes Why the Democrats’ love affair with ‘free trade deals’ is over
Mike Norman writes The Cheapest Way For Trump To Save U.S. Oil — Lourcey Sams
Mike Norman writes Sputnik — WTO Allows China to Impose Retaliatory Measures Worth .6 Bln Against US
Mike Norman writes Lars P. Syll — Paul Krugman — finally — admits he was wrong!
Typically, Washington is against anything that benefits Moscow, and is for anything which bolsters the position of US puppet regime Ukraine. But, at ongoing cases before the World Trade Organization, that narrative isn’t applicable. This is so because if Washington slam Moscow for its actions relative to Kiev, it would provide a case against Trump’s metals tariffs. However, by standing with Russia on this issue, Washington thinks that it can save its own trade actions, namely Trump’s metals tariffs.…
National security trumps WTO regs. Both the US and Russia are claiming national security supervenes in their cases, and the US is supporting Russia on this.
In effect, this is the recognition that the national sovereignty supersedes international agreements in certain cases. The nation state is not dead yet.
The Duran
SHOCKER: US sides with Moscow over Kiev in WTO case
The Duran
SHOCKER: US sides with Moscow over Kiev in WTO case
Frank Sellers