by As far as I'm concerned this is essential viewing. Tulsi Gabbard says she and thousands of others joined the military to go get Al-Qaeda after 9/11, but now, after many years and endless wars, with millions of people left dead, the U.S. is protecting Al-Qaeda in Syria and the other head chopping terrorists there. Al-Qaeda are now stronger than ever, she says.Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill to stop American tax payer's money funding terrorist groups, but it never received one vote in Congress. American tax is payer funding Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Deash, or whatever ABC they come up with next, and yet all the media talks about is Russia meddling in the US presidential election of which there is no evidence. Now, just imagine if it was Russia or China that was supporting terrorist groups all over
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill to stop American tax payer's money funding terrorist groups, but it never received one vote in Congress. American tax is payer funding Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Deash, or whatever ABC they come up with next, and yet all the media talks about is Russia meddling in the US presidential election of which there is no evidence. Now, just imagine if it was Russia or China that was supporting terrorist groups all over the world? Just imagine if they had caused all the wars and made lots of money out of them - that it was big business? People in the West don't have a clue.