by Summary:
Appears (empirically) as if our ability to abstract might be in direct conflict with our ability of rote memorization... Solomon Shereshevsky (Luria, 1968) had an almost perfect literal memory. He remembers strings of hundreds of digits for years after only having read them once. I would like to explain this by his awesome synesthesia: everything is encoded in so many ways that everything is considered as new, and so a new memory trace is formed to remember it (we know that "first time" experiences are well remembered (Robinson, 1993), as are distinctive features (Hunt & Worthen, 2006)). Shereshevsky's gift was compensated by big difficulties recognizing... and had basically no understanding of abstraction: metaphor, figurative language. So then it follows that those with an
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Appears (empirically) as if our ability to abstract might be in direct conflict with our ability of rote memorization... Solomon Shereshevsky (Luria, 1968) had an almost perfect literal memory. He remembers strings of hundreds of digits for years after only having read them once. I would like to explain this by his awesome synesthesia: everything is encoded in so many ways that everything is considered as new, and so a new memory trace is formed to remember it (we know that "first time" experiences are well remembered (Robinson, 1993), as are distinctive features (Hunt & Worthen, 2006)). Shereshevsky's gift was compensated by big difficulties recognizing... and had basically no understanding of abstraction: metaphor, figurative language. So then it follows that those with an
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Matias Vernengo writes What is heterodox economics?
Appears (empirically) as if our ability to abstract might be in direct conflict with our ability of rote memorization...
Solomon Shereshevsky (Luria, 1968) had an almost perfect literal memory. He remembers strings of hundreds of digits for years after only having read them once. I would like to explain this by his awesome synesthesia: everything is encoded in so many ways that everything is considered as new, and so a new memory trace is formed to remember it (we know that "first time" experiences are well remembered (Robinson, 1993), as are distinctive features (Hunt & Worthen, 2006)).
Shereshevsky's gift was compensated by big difficulties recognizing... and had basically no understanding of abstraction: metaphor, figurative language.
So then it follows that those with an underdeveloped ability to abstract would most likely retreat into reification and misplaced concreteness when receiving metaphor and figurative language from others... i.e. "out of money!", "banks lend out the deposits!", "government as household!", etc...
Stack Exchange Psychology & Neuroscience
Is abstract knowledge incompatible with literal memorization?