Summary of the issues and argument.Interestingly, Tinbergen was award a "Nobel" (1969), while Keynes was never so honored in spite of being one of the most significant contributors to economics and economic policy in the 20th century, if not the most significant. Now, "Keynes" and "Keynesianism" are household words, while few remember Tinbergen other than related to Keynes-Tinbergen controversy.Lars P. Syll’s BlogEconometrics: The Keynes-Tinbergen controversyLars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: Jan Tinbergen, john maynard keynes
This could be interesting, too:
Steve Roth writes John Maynard Keynes Doesn’t Seem to Know What He Means by the Word “Spending”
Mike Norman writes Lars P. Syll — On the non-neutrality of money
Mike Norman writes Uncertainty — Brian Romanchuk
Mike Norman writes Why Keynes was a socialist — Andrew Jackson
Summary of the issues and argument.
Interestingly, Tinbergen was award a "Nobel" (1969), while Keynes was never so honored in spite of being one of the most significant contributors to economics and economic policy in the 20th century, if not the most significant. Now, "Keynes" and "Keynesianism" are household words, while few remember Tinbergen other than related to Keynes-Tinbergen controversy.
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Econometrics: The Keynes-Tinbergen controversy
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University