Tuesday , November 5 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Lessons from Nick Hanaeur and Dee Hock

Lessons from Nick Hanaeur and Dee Hock

Summary:
Neil Wilson posted the following at Bill Mitchell’s today. My point is that, under capitalism, if you can’t pay your costs from your income you go bust – which releases your market space for somebody who is either more productive, or more realistic in their pricing. Cheap labour and a systemic lack of jobs encourages undercutting – the parasite businesses Nick Hanaeur speaks of. “It is appealing to believe that the parasite economy will eventually correct itself. Or that a few high-road employers will set an example that will eliminate it. But trust me when I tell you: This is wishful thinking. I know because I am one of those employers. People, like me, when faced with brutal competitive dynamics, will not pay workers a living wage unless all of our competitors do the same. And the only

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:
Neil Wilson posted the following at Bill Mitchell’s today.
My point is that, under capitalism, if you can’t pay your costs from your income you go bust – which releases your market space for somebody who is either more productive, or more realistic in their pricing.
Cheap labour and a systemic lack of jobs encourages undercutting – the parasite businesses Nick Hanaeur speaks of.
“It is appealing to believe that the parasite economy will eventually correct itself. Or that a few high-road employers will set an example that will eliminate it. But trust me when I tell you: This is wishful thinking. I know because I am one of those employers. People, like me, when faced with brutal competitive dynamics, will not pay workers a living wage unless all of our competitors do the same. And the only way that will happen is if citizens like you require employers like us to do it. Until then, corporate America will continue to build its record profits on the backs of cheap labor.
From some reason my comment in response was rejected as looking like spam, so I am posting it here instead. I have also added to the original comment:

Nick Hanaeur is correct, but he doesn't go far enough. It's not just the wage bill, but everything that can contribute to profit, including the environment.

CORPORATIONS: SOCIALIZATION OF COST AND CAPITALIZATION OF PROFIT

The essence of capitalism is captured in the name. Capitalism is about prioritizing capital as ownership over labor as people and land as the environment because it is assumed that capital formation leads to growth, which makes all better off from trickle down — "A rising tide lifts all boats."

Note that this is different from economic liberalism as laissez-faire," because it assumes that government should favor capital accumulation by preventing obstacles to it. This is the basis of neoliberalism.

The problem with capitalism is capital since ownership's goal is maximizing gain without considering consequences that don't directly affect owners in a relatively short period of time.

As Yanis Varoufakis recently wrote in a piece for the Guardian, "The problem with capitalism is that it is irrational."

Unbridled capitalism is irrational economically since it leads to inefficiency, being based on rent-seeking. It is also socially in damaging both people and the environment, when an economy is the material life-support system for a society and the global economy is the life-support system for the world. That makes capitalism dangerous to boot.


Neoliberalism as government controlled by capital and operated to favor capital is also antithetical to democracy defined as rule of, by and for the people

This dynamic unfolds inevitably unless the public acts collectively through government to set rules within which firms are required to operate that protect people and the environment and promote the common good and general welfare as public purpose.


The problem with capitalism lies in the design. The job guarantee is an ad hoc measure that corrects of the design deficiencies. But it is not an overhaul. 

The existing economic system needs even more that an overhaul. It needs to be redesigned to integrate and harmonize all factors with an eye to the ultimate purpose of the global economy as an integral part of the planetary life-support system.
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *