The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche expressed the cautionaryadmonition: “Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster.” Too often, we have ignored that warning. Gina Haspel’s defenders assert that her behavior conformed to procedures that senior CIA officials (and presumably the Bush White House) had approved. The international community rejected the “just following orders” defense that defendants invoked at the Nuremberg trials. Haspel’s defense is no more valid or persuasive. We should not accept a female version of the Marquis de Sade to lead the CIA. A refusal to do so would be a modest, but important, first step in reclaiming America’s soul. The foundation of liberalism is the rule of law regarding human rights and constitutional liberties. I
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: accountability, CIA, Gina Haspel, international law, liberal democracy, liberalism, Nuremberg defense, rule of law, torture
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes Was Keynes a Liberal or a Socialist?
Chris Blattman writes The new Kashmir: How I think the Russia-Ukraine conflict could play out
Chris Blattman writes The new Kashmir: How I think the Russia-Ukraine conflict could play out
Chris Blattman writes Up with international relations theory, down with the -isms, and down with the certainty
The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche expressed the cautionaryadmonition: “Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster.” Too often, we have ignored that warning. Gina Haspel’s defenders assert that her behavior conformed to procedures that senior CIA officials (and presumably the Bush White House) had approved. The international community rejected the “just following orders” defense that defendants invoked at the Nuremberg trials. Haspel’s defense is no more valid or persuasive. We should not accept a female version of the Marquis de Sade to lead the CIA. A refusal to do so would be a modest, but important, first step in reclaiming America’s soul.The foundation of liberalism is the rule of law regarding human rights and constitutional liberties. I would say that the real problem with respect to liberalism is failure to observe the rule of law, along with failure to hold those violating the law to account.
Liberalism is idealistic, whereas politics and economics are realistic. This leads to paradoxes of liberalism that affect liberal democracy.
Good article. Worth reading the whole thing.
The National Interest
The Real Problem with Gina Haspel's CIA Nomination
Also
A Chilean reports on women torturers under Pinochet.
Counterpunch
It’s Time the United States Accounts for Its History of Torture