I have written about this previously in the comments. Alexander Dugin summarized the main points pretty well. To understand the dynamic going on now in international relations, foreign affairs, military affairs, geopolitics, geostrategy, and choice of tactics, it is necessary to understand this outline in some detail. This is the grand chessboard on which the great game is being played presently between the land powers and their allies and the sea powers and their allies. The stakes are world domination for the foreseeable future, if this is a future given the enormous power of weapons of mass destruction that may be brought into play.GeopolitikaGeopolitics of multipolarity (Beijing lecture) Alexander Dugin See also by Alexander Dugin at Geopolitika The main principles of multipolar
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: geopolitics, geostrategy, Halford John Mackinder, heartland, multipolarism, Nicholas Spykman, rimland, unipolarism, world island
This could be interesting, too:
Matias Vernengo writes The US and Russia: beware of Neocons and liberals preaching democracy promotion
Mike Norman writes US primes NATO to confront Russia, China — M. K. Bhadrakumar
Mike Norman writes The Birth of Eurasia — Godfree Roberts
Mike Norman writes India’s RCEP Refusal, Russia’s Eurasian Vision, and Next Week’s BRICS Summit Andrew Korybko
Geopolitika
Geopolitics of multipolarity (Beijing lecture)
See also by Alexander Dugin at Geopolitika
The main principles of multipolar world order
- Philosophically: real pluralism, diversity, multitude of subjects
- Anthropologically: inclusive humanism, multinaturalism
- Geopolitically: complex system of regional powers (Gross Raum)
- Economically: free trade without (neo) liberal dogmatic
- Politically: diversity of political systems (dependeing on historical traditions of each people)
- Culturally: positive acceptance of different identities
Dugin calls it traditionalism as opposed to Western liberalism, but it sounds like a version of liberalism that integrates traditionalism instead of a version of liberalism that regard liberalism and traditionalism as mutually exclusive.