Friday , May 17 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / John Quiggin — Shorten gets opportunity cost right

John Quiggin — Shorten gets opportunity cost right

Summary:
The concept of opportunity cost “The opportunity cost of anything of value is what you must give up so that you can have it.” is the central theme of my book Economics in Two Lessons,due out in the US on 19 April and hopefully in Australia soon after that. My central claim is that two lessons based on opportunity cost and their relationship to market prices provide a framework within which almost any problem in economic policy can usefully be considered.…So, I was impressed to see Bill Shorten use the term in relation to climate change inaction. Not only that but he used it correctly! Here’s Bill, quoted in the SMH Opposition Leader Bill Shorten defended the new policy by urging voters to consider the cost of inaction on climate change, saying “There is a huge opportunity cost when we

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important: ,

This could be interesting, too:

Joel Eissenberg writes Oh, Elon!

Angry Bear writes BP Softens tone on 2030 oil output cut to reassure investors

Eric Kramer writes Gerald “Digger” Moravek was a rancher, an early environmentalist, and a dog killer.  Just like Kristi Noem, but not.

Joel Eissenberg writes Is China eating our EV lunch?

The concept of opportunity cost “The opportunity cost of anything of value is what you must give up so that you can have it.” is the central theme of my book Economics in Two Lessons,due out in the US on 19 April and hopefully in Australia soon after that. My central claim is that two lessons based on opportunity cost and their relationship to market prices provide a framework within which almost any problem in economic policy can usefully be considered.…

So, I was impressed to see Bill Shorten use the term in relation to climate change inaction. Not only that but he used it correctly! Here’s Bill, quoted in the SMH
Opposition Leader Bill Shorten defended the new policy by urging voters to consider the cost of inaction on climate change, saying “There is a huge opportunity cost when we don’t take action,”
What the cost of not doing something is, must be considered along with the cost of not doing it. This is the implicit justification for military spending for "national security" and advancing "national interest." That is to say, existential threats have priority over resources. The question is whether climate change is an existential threat. Is so, then all resources must be mobilized, which will involve sacrificing lower priorities.

John Quiggin's Blog
Shorten gets opportunity cost right
John Quiggin | Professor and an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow at the University of Queensland, and a member of the Board of the Climate Change Authority of the Australian Government
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *