by Summary:
Max Blumenthal describes how the U.S funds Jihadist terrorism as its proxy army around the world. He adds that the Neocons back this on behalf of Israel, and the military-industrial complex see it as more business as usual. But he then goes on to say that the liberal-interventionists back these wars believing they are taking down bad regimes. Personally, I believe that liberal-interventionism is just propaganda and a cover for the Neocons.Max Bluthemthal describes the U.S. crime of destroying Libya and how they are trying to do the same to Venezuela.What has Russia done compared to the U.S. asks Max Bluthemthal? Absolutely nothing in my opinion.I've always liked Cenk Uygur but he seems to be becoming even more radical nowadays, which is good. [embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Max Blumenthal describes how the U.S funds Jihadist terrorism as its proxy army around the world. He adds that the Neocons back this on behalf of Israel, and the military-industrial complex see it as more business as usual. But he then goes on to say that the liberal-interventionists back these wars believing they are taking down bad regimes. Personally, I believe that liberal-interventionism is just propaganda and a cover for the Neocons.Max Blumenthal describes how the U.S funds Jihadist terrorism as its proxy army around the world. He adds that the Neocons back this on behalf of Israel, and the military-industrial complex see it as more business as usual. But he then goes on to say that the liberal-interventionists back these wars believing they are taking down bad regimes. Personally, I believe that liberal-interventionism is just propaganda and a cover for the Neocons.Max Bluthemthal describes the U.S. crime of destroying Libya and how they are trying to do the same to Venezuela.What has Russia done compared to the U.S. asks Max Bluthemthal? Absolutely nothing in my opinion.I've always liked Cenk Uygur but he seems to be becoming even more radical nowadays, which is good. [embedded content]
Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
New Economics Foundation writes Is the Labour government delivering on its promises?
Robert Vienneau writes Why Is Marginalist Economics Wrong?
John Quiggin writes Dispensing with the US-centric financial system
New Economics Foundation writes Whose growth is it anyway?
Max Bluthemthal describes the U.S. crime of destroying Libya and how they are trying to do the same to Venezuela.
What has Russia done compared to the U.S. asks Max Bluthemthal? Absolutely nothing in my opinion.
I've always liked Cenk Uygur but he seems to be becoming even more radical nowadays, which is good.