Sunday , November 24 2024
Home / Mike Norman Economics / Pankaj Mishra – China Needs to Be More Chinese

Pankaj Mishra – China Needs to Be More Chinese

Summary:
The country has stood up, but on Western terms rather than those its greatest leaders and thinkers once envisioned. China wasn't always authoritarian, and in the past it successfully ruled as a soft state. The state was considered there to serve society, rather than the other way around.China has fought back against the brutal Western imperialism, says Pankaj Mishra, with a counter harshness and industrialisation, but it's time for it to find its more gentle and tolerant tradition. Xi may impress some with a display of Chinese military hardware. But the nationalism he seeks to turn into a civil religion is not only felt to be oppressive by many people -- whether Muslims in Xinjiang, Buddhists in Tibet or protesters in Hong Kong. It is also profoundly derivative, without Chinese

Topics:
Mike Norman considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Matias Vernengo writes Elon Musk (& Vivek Ramaswamy) on hardship, because he knows so much about it

Lars Pålsson Syll writes Klas Eklunds ‘Vår ekonomi’ — lärobok med stora brister

New Economics Foundation writes We need more than a tax on the super rich to deliver climate and economic justice

Robert Vienneau writes Profits Not Explained By Merit, Increased Risk, Increased Ability To Compete, Etc.

The country has stood up, but on Western terms rather than those its greatest leaders and thinkers once envisioned.


China wasn't always authoritarian, and in the past it successfully ruled as a soft state. The state was considered there to serve society, rather than the other way around.

China has fought back against the brutal Western imperialism, says Pankaj Mishra, with a counter harshness and industrialisation, but it's time for it to find its more gentle and tolerant tradition.

Xi may impress some with a display of Chinese military hardware. But the nationalism he seeks to turn into a civil religion is not only felt to be oppressive by many people -- whether Muslims in Xinjiang, Buddhists in Tibet or protesters in Hong Kong. It is also profoundly derivative, without Chinese characteristics.
Sun Yat-Sen, who is venerated as father of the Chinese nation in both the People’s Republic and Taiwan, was clear about this. Towards the end of his life, he warned his compatriots against adopting an idea of civilization developed in the West, which “when applied to society, will mean the cult of force, with aeroplanes, bombs, and cannons as its outstanding features.”

But what comes after development is significantly advanced, and the bullies lose their power to bully? Can China still offer something new and redemptive, just as its first generation of leaders hoped?
The possibility is kept alive by some Chinese thinkers at least. In a recent book, “Rethinking China’s Rise: A Liberal Critique,” Xu Jilin, one of China’s major public intellectuals, laments that the national pride sweeping the Chinese today is born out of beating the West at its own game rather than devising the rules of a new, less destructive game.
Refusing to be over-impressed by China’s material success, Xu delves into its moral, intellectual and spiritual traditions. He offers a vision of China as a tolerant society -- one that has recovered its civilizational values of pluralism and practices them domestically as well as internationally.
Bloomberg 
Mike Norman
Mike Norman is an economist and veteran trader whose career has spanned over 30 years on Wall Street. He is a former member and trader on the CME, NYMEX, COMEX and NYFE and he managed money for one of the largest hedge funds and ran a prop trading desk for Credit Suisse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *